Jun 8, 2008


We are of a similar mind to Poneke's post on Sutch of earlier today. But for some reason it is no longer there. In summary we remain unconvinced that Sutch's meeting was innocent - but we accept also that the there is no hard evidence out there to show what exactly was going on.

This was also interesting from todays SST.

Update - Poneke's post is back up (with a new title)